Posts
Opa2134 vs ne5532
Opa2134 vs ne5532. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. Jan 7, 2021 · So considering NE5532, LM4562 and OPA2134, OPA2134 gives best measured results in AIYIMA A07. Thread starter evm1024; Start date Nov 3, 2008; But you will see lots of great gear with NE5532's, TL0xx, JRC458x. The best solution is to use NE5532 in I/V-stage and LM4562 in differential amplifier as it gives almost identical performance to all-LM4562 implementation Differences in distortion are mostly due to odd left/right Is OP Amp swapping the key to better sound quality or a complete waste of time?Op Amps: https://fosiaudioshop. NE5532 vs NE5534: Price Point and Availability. And without mentioning every op amp in existence, I'll close with I yet have to find a circuit where an NE5532 is the best possible option. Apr 6, 2020 · Bottom line, check the supply voltages, pin 4 and 8. May 24, 2015 · If you can use a bipolar OP, the NE5532 is usually the better choice than a JFET OPA2132 / OPA2134. 4kHz bandwidth Here we see that the LM4562, LM833, LM49720 and OPA2134 all have the same level of performance with the NJM2742 having the worst performance of the bunch and the LT1352 being just slightly worse. Registering takes only a few moments but gives you increased capabilities. " Jun 13, 2016 · ポータブルアンプのオペアンプ、オペレーションアンプの交換の実験です。なかなかオペアンプの聴き比べは手間がかかるもの、今回は安価な価格帯のオペアンプから、様々な聴き比べをしていきます。 Apr 19, 2024 · In this article, we'll delve into the OPA2134 op-amp, exploring its pinout, circuit, features, applications, datasheet, etc, and the difference between OPA2134 and NE5532. LM is the best overall, it sounds the most balanced, very natural/smooth/clean, doesnt exaggerate anything but can sound lacking in impact. The OPAx132 amplifiers are different than the OPAx604 in that the x604 can use ±24V supplies, whereas the x132 and x134 can use only ±18V. 2k, and remember that you'll need to include a muting circuit to prevent 'chirps' when power is removed. The TLO72 has a very limited ability to drive a load, it's prone to latch up if the inputs are overloaded, and has many other "features" that make it undesirable for audio in my opinion. ナチュラルビューティー。脚色がほとんどない、いわば素肌美人である。音の抜けが良く、ジャンルを問わず使える感じ。超高域の解放感はもう一歩か。でも、充分リファレンス用途までいける。単価も音質の割に破格と言っていいだろう。 Mar 5, 2007 · 3. Although many people consider the NE5532 to be an old component and try to find a new one to replace it, the NE5532 is still adequate for most applications. Harpsichord was lost. Mar 25, 2022 · Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 The OPA2134 is a Fet Input op-amp, while the NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp. 00008% but in my area I can't find OPA2134. I have replaced 5532s in a DAC with OPA2134, and there was a very audible improvement. 1. While the OPA2134 offers superior performance in terms of lower noise,deformation, and potentially advanced bandwidth, it comes with an advanced price label. NE5532 - Clearly more accurate than the OPA2134 but violin tone was not quite as convincing as the LME49720. Results NE5532 with Rl=1k1 and different output levels vs frequency NE5532 with Rl=520R and different output levels vs frequency Audio Opamps, fact, myths and THD measurement resultsRev. NE5532 Package. comAll files and Gerber :https://drive. Transients were still good but the HF levels seemed to be a bit rounded off. I want to use NE5532 instead. I threw an NE5532 and it helped smoothen it out quite a bit. OPA2134 and NE5532 both have power supply currents of about 4mA per channel, and have been widely adopted in the market (understatement). Aug 28, 2023 · 2. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. Feb 16, 2007 · HiI am building a 3-way active cross over circuit. The AD8599 is on it way and some highly respect it. Generally Nov 9, 2012 · Muses02 vs BB OPA2134 in Topping A30 (single-ended to differential buffer) Rig includes: Topping A30 and D30, HD600s (vintage 2017) with HD650 (genuine Sennheiser replacement part) 3m cable (1. We get lower current noise and better EMI resistence. LM4562 is the best performer in differential amplifier. It is difficult to say which one is better. To my ears, it sounds much better and has good bass. the ne5532 looks a bit harder, narrower and more direct, the other two a bit more relaxed and Part Number: OPA1656 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, OPA2604 The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. The OPAx132 is the slightly better version for DC critical applications. In order to login you must be registered. OPA2134 seems inoffensive and defined enough but it's got this flat, slightly recessed in the midrange presentation - not quite what I'd call "dull" but not bright, just a bit "hifi", it sounds like an entry-level Japanese solid-state amplifier, and there's not much openess Oct 10, 2020 · Here in sweden we have also investigated the ne5532 because there was rumours that it was a fake one in the Aiyima a04. com/products/op-amp-chip-muses02-opa2604ap-opa2 Oct 8, 2001 · the opa2134 are actually cheap and maybe give some sonic differences, but I have read that even high-end brands use the ne5532 I am, gonna switch the opamps in my CD player soon with opa2134 (are reaaaaal low budget types) but I would like more to change the cap's to high-end types, their influence non-lineairuty is understandeble and evident, while the opamps only make a difference below Sep 6, 2024 · Login; The board requires you to be registered and logged in to view this forum. Oct 30, 2022 · The NE5532, LM358 and JCR4558 are also pin compatible, so could just drop into a socket or board footprint. The NE5532 is a high-performance, low-noise operational amplifier with twin channels. OPA2134 vs. google. Apr 16, 2011 · Just to add to your list, the OPA2134 ($2. Preferably use bipolar (DIY version: two back-to-back) or low-leakage types for coupling caps. If the NE5532 improved its HF performance it would sound the best of all these by a reasonable margin . Although many people dismiss the NE5532 as an obsolete component and try to locate a replacement, the NE5532 is still adequate for most applications. Jan 21, 2016 · In case of an OPA2134 I'd stick with 10k-20k, NE5532 with its much lower input impedance distortion shouldn't have much of a problem with 50k or even 100k. Before that, it was as sharp and cold as a swiss knife. LME49720 - Not so bright sound but now we could hear the correct timbre of the violins and the harpsichord suddenly appeared. 1 4/19 2016-07-13 ACAV Jan 28, 2018 · I recently got a Matrix Audio M-STAGE HPA 2C classic with an OPA2134 and it was a little harsh on top. NE5532 can be configured at +/-20Vdc, drawing about 8mA. Jan 10, 2006 · RC4580 vs NJM4560 vs M5218 vs OPA2134 etc. ). NE5532, OPA2134, LM4562, etc. Jun 10, 2010 · I found one posting in a board where a guy claimed he changed the ne5532 to the opa2134 and noticed a real difference in a DBX compressor. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. Sep 7, 2024 · I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. Jan 8, 2017 · LM4562 and NE5532 show almost identical performance in I/V stage, while OPA2134 is 2 dB weaker. NE5532 Время обновления: 2024-04-19 15:30:48 Nov 8, 2006 · OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. Jun 20, 2016 · The NE5532 is still a decent op amp. It is actually best to test them in the circuit. Nov 26, 2017 · thanks for your tips! i have tested the opa2604 and the LME49720 compared to the ne5532. the differences aren't huge, but big enough to make a change worthwhile. The OPA134, OPA2134, and OPA4134 (OPAx134) series are ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers fully specified for audio applications. Aug 1, 2011 · NE5532 – The reasonably priced objective benchmark ; OPA2134 – A mainstream audiophile favorite ; OPA2227 – Pushing the high-end of the budget with excellent specs ; OPA2277 – For the low power O2 (long battery life version) LM4562 – An audiophile favorite (NJM4562 stocked at Mouser) Dec 17, 2018 · OPA627 does not appear to be pin compatible with NE5532. Some suggest other bipolar or JFET opamps as alternatives or improvements. Mar 11, 2020 · JLCPCB Prototype for $2(Any Color): https://jlcpcb. If you use TL072 opamps, keep resistor values above 2. I'm not sure what's better on paper but I think certain combinations of DACs and opamps can work better than others. NE5534 Circuit. And it is a JFET opamp, which is always preferred by myself in the positions where slightly higher voltage noise of the opamp is negligible, like here. This video title is; 2Which OpAmp is Better for 20W Class A Amplifier - OPA2604 vs NE553 Jun 8, 2010 · The OPA2134 is a lower spec version of the OPA2132. but the difference between opa2604 and LME49720 is much smaller than the difference between these two compared to the original ne5532. Double blind AB, the TL074 circuit had audible hiss from the speaker, and the 2134 circuit did not. It outperforms most typical operational amplifiers, including 1458, in terms of noise performance, output drive capability, and small-signal and power bandwidths. 67 at Mouser) is a drop in replacement for the NE5532. NE5534's Price Tag Oct 8, 2017 · Lower values can be used if the opamps can drive low impedances with minimal distortion (e. I would recommend OPA2134 or OPA134 and if you have money the OPA627 or OPA637. I've studied around in different forums and found information about differences between the resistor value going to ground. That seemed like a reasonable target for the supply current of the OPA1656 as well. While the opa2132 and opa2134 share similarities, they also have unique characteristics. Choosing between the LM4562 and NE5532 depends on your specific application requirements and priorities. +Gain Bandwidth. 4" plug). I never liked the OPA2134. Knock yourself out, try OPA2134, NJM2068DD, LM4562,,, OPA2134 vs. A quick snapshot of the OPA1656 performance specs: Feb 8, 2022 · Download OPA2134 Amplifier Datasheet PDF. NE5532 OPA2134 Pinout, Datasheet, Equivalent, and OPA2134 vs. Don't let power supply current limitations get in the way of performance. May 30, 2007 · Users share their opinions and experiences on replacing NE5532 opamps with OPA2134 in a Sony CD player. Apr 17, 2021 · I will show the difference between the OPA2604 vs the NE5532 OpAmp. Not that the opa have much higher input impedence than the bipolar ne5532. strangely its probably the most boring sounding one when paired with 400i but the best sounding with hd600 Oct 31, 2015 · The opa2134 or OPa2132 is generally better than ne5532 but the question is rarely so simple. TL072 works most of the time but I almost always find a better substitute in dirt pedals. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. For one of the OP amp it's optimal with 1k and for the other one it's 2k. OPA2134 Op-Amp FAQ. Normal audio can use the cheaper OPA2134. 其低压性能特别出众并且工作稳定，是磨声卡的首选运放，全面超越OPA2604AU，OPA2134，NE5532等。OPA2134是它的(lower quality）版，在低压情况下可能出现不稳定状态。这时候最好的选择就是将其更换为OPA2132U。 “这是一个很好的运算放大器系列。 Aug 24, 2018 · THD+N Ratio vs Measured Level / Inverting 6dB Gain / 100k load / 22. com/open?id=1kzo6G9kJmkIaBmcjEtPp6dqDExES677MChannel animasi Jun 17, 2007 · NE5532 LM6172 LM4562 OPA2107 OPA2604 OPA2227 OPA2132 NJM4556 AD8066 AD823 AD843 AD744 AD8620 OPA2132 - almost like OPA2134, maybe a bit smoother sound. Apr 19, 2024 · In this article, we'll delve into the OPA2134 op-amp, exploring its pinout, circuit, features, applications, datasheet, etc, and the difference between OPA2134 and NE5532. Thought it was quite thick sounding and lacked air. On the other hand, the opa2134 offers superior audio performance, making it perfect for audio applications. Need to keep in mind the supply voltage and current draw. It needs to be mounted on an adapter to be used here. LM4562 I found more accurate and fast but not necessarily musical. . Aug 26, 2018 · opa2134：纵向声场宽广，低频下潜不错，量感一般，高频解析力好，但是有一点毛剌，不够柔和。 推荐度：★★★☆ OPA2111：中频非常舒服，高频柔和，但低频比AD712还弱，声场很窄，没有传说中那么好。 Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. While you could use the LM324 (very similar to the LM358), you would need to wire it differently. That is what got me wondering if there were any new and improved op amps that could be direct replacements for my Drawmer 1960. NE5534 Package. Generally, the NE5532 is more affordable, making it a popular choice for budget-friendly audio projects. Voice reproduction was BEST in the NE5532 ! Unfortunately it was a bit low in the HF. But $40-57 each. ••• ne5532 ne5532：確實有點膽味，解析力一般，高頻比較燥，低頻比較糊且肥。 各款運放音質比較評測 來源: - BigAudio耳擴耳機及升級線專賣店 by OP-amp by song Jump table ↓* VOCAL CLASSIC POPSMUSES03 0:42~ 1:42~ 2:43~ Nov 29, 2023 · NE5532 vs NE5534: Difference in Circuit NE5532 Circuit. Feb 28, 2021 · I’m a bit underwhelmed by the LM833. my opinion. Certainly use a socket for opamp rolling. In the following composition, we will introduce the differences between OPA2134 and NE5532 in detail in terms of performance, characteristics, and operations. Mar 19, 2014 · The NE5532 is far superior to the TLO72 in just about every way for audio use, only real exception being the 5532s' relatively large input current spec. When used as a single dual stereo op amp I find the soundstage a bit flat and a thick sound. NE5532 vs NE5534: Difference in Package. Double-blind AB we also preferred the OPA2134 at the listening position, especially with the EQ in heavy use. There are several versions of the NE5532. OPA2604 is a little bit faster. This may be the case with low frequency filters. However, if you want the best possible stereo imaging and resolution with regard to phase critical stereo information, much lower distortion is in order. The older ones (Signetics) sound more warm and analog with a bit of an aura, but less accurate. At the risk of immediately coming across as exaggerated and/or hyped -- the "battle" was simply an epic slaughter! Dec 22, 2016 · LM4562 in my revox player took more than 100 hours to sound good. Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 In conclusion, the comparison between OPA2134 and NE5532 reveals two protean functional amplifiers suitable for a wide range of audio operations. Don't probe the IC, find a connected cap, resistor Also check that the current draw of the replacement IC is about the same as the NE5532, lower current draw means low volt drop in R's and higher supply voltage. I find the TI version of NE5532 better at revealing detail and timbre and with better stereo imaging. OPA2134 OP amps. I sent my original NE5532 to an hificonstructor and he did measurements , showing that the Aiyima a04 op amps was not fake. OPA2134 has good tone and detail when in single mono mode ie with two op amps one per channel. Apr 11, 2024 · OPA2134 and NE5532 are popular functional amplifiers (op-amps) famed for their audio fidelity and versatility. That was the circuit where the OPA2134 sounded better. Mar 17, 2019 · 3. Apr 19, 2024 · Дома > Other > OPA2134 Pinout, Datasheet, Equivalent, and OPA2134 vs. And Apr 21, 2019 · SparkOS Discrete Op-amps SS3601 and SS3602 with comparisons to Ne5532/5534, Muses02, Burson v6 Classic, and Burson v6 Vivid op amps Mar 21, 2022 · NE5532 Overview. The OPA2134 is more a better replacement for the TL072 when you need a FET type. The x134 and x132 are available in quads, where the x604 is available only in dual and singles, probably because of the power limitations of a quad package. g. #1 Choose the LM4562 (LM4562 vs NE5532): High-End Audio Quality: If your application demands the highest audio quality, low distortion, and minimal noise interference, the LM4562 is a better choice Feb 11, 2021 · I last tried the circuit with OPA2134 in year 2000, and with TL074 in 1992. Now they seems to have changed again to opa1612 in many places - maybe a suggestion to try ? I have tried ne5532, opa2604, lm4562 and opa1612 and I prefered LM 4562 in both Aiyima a07 and the tpa3251-based Aiyima a04. How to choose between lm4562 vs ne5532. Jun 23, 2007 · NE5532 or LM833 Frickecello The OPA2134 is an excellent replacement for the NE5532, and IMHO, well worth the extra cost. But that does not say anything about the SQ. But I couldn't find anything about NE5532 THD in Datasheet. Aug 1, 2011 · OPA2134 - nice euphonic sound but violins sounded synthetic and a little bright. Aug 22, 2005 · I'd use an OP275 instead of a NE5532, it's better sounding (sweeter) and has no dc offset to contend with 1to5mv, so can be direct coupled, unlike the NE5532 which i've seen sometimes at 400mv, and the OP275 can be cheaper, sometimes. A The OPA134, OPA2134, and OPA4134 (OPAx134) series are ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers fully specified for audio applications. A true FET input stage is incorporated to provide excellent sound quality and speed for exceptional audio performance. These would toast opa2134. NE5532 was VERY good in LF and midrange performance. Nov 25, 2015 · Ive compared the NE5532, NJM4556 and LM4562 so far. Dec 6, 2018 · Tone controls? DAC reconstruction filter? The better FET-input op-amps are expensive because they are laser-trimmed and prices can be crazy. the design is based on opa2134 Dual OpAmp Which has a THD=0. I would say it depends on what circuit. The opa2132 provides high precision, making it ideal for demanding applications. OPA2132. Cost of NE5532. NE5532 Jul 22, 2022 · OPA2134 is great for buffer and clean applications but I never liked it for overdrive/distortion. 高音質電源改善アクセサリーを中心に、音響を中心に電気で世の中に貢献しています。 Feb 10, 2012 · The 5532/5534 is an excellent sounding and very durable work horse; the OPA134 series can be adequate too. Not familiar with modern devices so I would use old school OPA2134 or LM4562. The different players sounded different. OPA2134 vs NE5532? The NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp, whereas the OPA2134 is a FET Input op-amp.
hara
ugay
pql
hahrl
spmew
paklc
ucfj
otgavwy
rahpmeh
gbh